March 2007

Religion in Latvia: Not what Hutcherson says it is

Posted by Robin Evans  at 8:39 AM (PT)
In: religion

Latvian blogger Peteris Cedrins has added an extensive comment to an earlier post here in which we touched on religion in Latvia. Peteris confirms our suspicion that statements like Hutcherson's that "Latvia is a Christian nation" are more aspirational than factual. Given the interference of our local preacher in Latvian politics, Cedrins' comment deserves to be brought up here to the top. [We apologize that the Blogger software that we use in the background for this blog can't handle the diacritical marks that are used on most Latvian names, including Cedrins'.]

by Peteris Cedrins
Detailed information on religion in Europe is available as a .pdf file from Eurobarometer. The chart there shows that 37% of respondents in Latvia choose "I believe there is a God" (in a multiple choice that included "I believe there is some sort of spirit or life force," 49%) -- that makes Latvia less religious than the UK (god -- 38%), and the UK is not considered especially religious. The least religious country in Europe is our northern neighbor, Estonia (God -- 16%). Mostly Catholic Lithuania -- 49%, Poland 80% (in that case we are probably seeing the effects of the Soviet occupation...).

The numbers among our neighbors point to our betweenness, as so often, and I do wish Eurobarometer would detail ethnicity/citizenship/region. Historically, Latvia was primarily Lutheran except for the eastern province of Latgallia, which was long a part of Poland and then Russia proper (i.e., not part of the Baltic Provinces which included Estonia and most of Latvia). Today, depending upon which numbers one believes, Lutherans, Catholics, and Orthodox are about equal (there's also a thriving minority of Old Believers, but the historically important Jewish minority was all but annihilated during the Nazi phase of the occupation).

Latvian nationalism was quite strongly anti-clerical, for the most part, from its inception in the 19th C -- the pastors were seen as agents of the hated Baltic German nobility. The Moravian Brethren, however, were instrumental in spreading literacy (by comparison to the rest of the Russian Empire and even to the West, it was very high here early on, in part due to home schooling) and ideas of equality. Then came socialism, exceedingly popular here in the late 19th and early 20th C, and obviously opposed to religion.

The Soviet occupation saw a shift -- religion was a means of resistance. The hierarchy is now fiercely conservative, however. Under the Soviets, the Lutherans ordained women. They no longer do that, and Archbishop Vanags has associated the Church with the Missouri Synod (which even complained about the women previously ordained...). The Catholic Cardinal Pujats, appointed in pectore by John Paul II, has contributed homophobic material to a small and venomously radical grouping led by Aivars Garda (Garda is a follower of Roerich's theosophical school, curiously enough -- though the Roerich Society has disassociated itself from him).

In Estonia, the Russian minority is reportedly more religious than the rather atheistic ethnic Estonians are. I believe that's true here, too, though I haven't any data to prove it.

It is hard to gauge how much religion in Latvia is merely formal. There is, however, not a little resentment towards the churches -- Archbishop Vanags' refusal to participate in ecumenical Independence Day services until various questions about the return of Church property were settled and until he was listened to re abortion (he wasn't) was widely remarked. The Government's use of large amounts of taxpayer money for the Pope's visit was not well received by many. Catholic dealings in Aglona, where they reclaimed a boarding school, caused a furore, and the "return" of Saint Peter's Church in our capital, despite the fact that the Lutherans haven't the money to support the major churches they do have, did not bring them much affection.

Hard, too, to measure the depth of the veneer -- the major holiday in this country is the summer solstice. This was the last part of Europe to be Chrisitianized -- Palanga, now in Lithuania, had a continuous female priesthood until the late 19th C, and paganism persisted in the less accessible parts of Latgallia into the 1930s. Latvian culture is rooted in the dainas, hundreds of thousands of folk songs.

Hard to measure what's Soviet, or totalitarian -- my wife's former atheism teacher, who tried to get her thrown out of school for sneering in Marxism class, became the head of the Department of Religious Affairs and denied a visa to the Dalai Lama. He easily morphed from orthodox Communism to hardcore Catholicism. Many others enjoyed such a metamorphosis.

Finally, here's a very interesting take on religious stats -- note where Latvia falls in Carlos' estimation... As you suggested, the USA is far more "Christian" than Latvia is -- up there with Malta, the most religious country in Europe.

[Update: As me mentions in a comment [to the original post on ttca.org], Peteris has added much more about this "burgeoning bilateral trade in excrement" in a new post on his blog. The post is especially informative about how LPP -- the Latvian party with which Hutcherson and his American partner in bigotry, Scott Lively, have aligned themselves -- uses homophobia to empower its broader political goals. Unfortunately, those tactics also copy and echo too much in recent US politics.]

Hutcherson's dream of a Christianist Latvia

Posted by Robin Evans  at 12:55 PM (PT)
In: international, nw_gaynews, religion, wingnuts

 

Presidents Bush and Vika-Freiberga in Riga President George W. Bush signs a guest book after Latvian President Vaira Vike-Freiberga presented him the Order of the Three Stars, First-Class at Riga Castle in Riga, Latvia, Saturday, May 7, 2005. Established in 1924 to commemorate the founding of the Latvian State, the medal is awarded to recognize outstanding civil merit in the service of Latvia. White House photo by Eric Draper

Does Pastor and discrimination-activist Ken Hutcherson see in Latvia the possibility of creating the kind of church-based (or Christianist as Andrew Sullivan calls it) government that he and his allies would like to see in the US? It seems possible. But the US Embassy, the State Department, and Latvia's President and friend-of-GWB Vaira Vike-Freiberga -- along with most people in Latvia -- may be standing in the way of his dream. David Postman has more on Hutcherson's complaints about what the preacher regards as inappropriate support from the US Embassy in Riga for the Latvian gay rights group Mozaika. Postman couldn't confirm Hutcherson's claims that the embassy helped to fund the gay group, but finds evidence that the embassy has helped the group which was formed in 2006 after a violence-tinged gay pride march was organized in Riga in 2005.

 The Embassy has helped organize events with Mozaika to promote tolerance of lesbians and gays -- as has the embassies of the UK and Sweden -- and the ambassador and Embassy staff have worked to protect gay rights activists when violent anti-gay protests broke out in Riga last year. The United States has documented anti-gay activities in Latvia. A report on Latvia's 2006 human rights record was released March 6 by the State Department's Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. It confirms what gay activists say, that Latvia has seen "societal violence and occasional government discrimination against homosexuals."
More...

Pride and hatred: History is politics in Latvia

Posted by Robin Evans  at 5:33 PM (PT)
In: international, nw_gaynews, wingnuts

Prior post: Pride and hatred: Hutcherson's odd connection with Latvia's homophobes

These are the domestic and regional political issues in Latvia into which US citizen Ken Hutcherson placed himself while making his still discredited claims that he had the power to speak for the White House: News item from Baltic Times, March 21:

Special Assignments Minister for Societal Integration Oskars Kastens said that Riga Pride, a gay and lesbian parade scheduled for May 30 - June 3, will only increase misconceptions about homosexuals among the country's population. The minister made the statement after receiving opinions from public organizations about a proposal to include the issue of sexual minorities in Latvia's national intolerance prevention program, the his office said. "A demonstration cannot solve the problem of intolerance that the sexual minorities are complaining about. Solutions must be sought in discussions, by hearing various opinions," Kastens said.

News item from Latvian Centre for Human Rights, March 15:

Head of Latvia's Roman Catholic Church, Cardinal Janis Pujats has sent an open letter to the Special Assignments Minister for Societal Integration Oskars Kastens stating that Catholic Church believes that there are no problems concerning intolerance in Latvia. Therefore, Janis Pujats argues that there is no need to elaborate national program on combating discrimination and intolerance.

More...

 

Pastor Ken Hutcherson in Riga Pastor Ken Hutcherson in Riga photo: New Generation Church

During his two recent visits to the Baltic republic of Latvia, Redmond's anti-gay activist pastor Ken Hutcherson called himself a "special envoy" from the White House Office of Faith Based Initiatives. The Stranger's Eli Sanders checked with the White House about the title. A spokesperson for the office told him that Hutcherson had no official sanction for his trip. Disputation ensues. The White House has reason to be concerned about the title that the pastor has been using because Hutcherson's activities in Latvia have embroiled him in a confusing, dangerous, and potentially violent local and regional political firestorm in the Baltic republic. We've been a bit mystified by this bizarre connection between that small republic on the Baltic and the local pastor. As we've mentioned before, a great Seattle Times story from January by reporter Janice I. Tu about Hutcherson's outreach to local Slavic emigrant churches seems to partly explain the local angle on his connections with Latvia. The Times' David Postman today points to the same article to explain the connection in his summary of the official-title flap. The picture accompanying the January story shows Hutcherson with a group that includes Alexey Ledyaev, the pastor of New Generation Church in Riga which sponsored Hutcherson's November trip to Latvia. Unfortunately, the story doesn't explain how the connection between the two pastors was first made.

But, in keeping with the "WebWrangler" handle we use here, we wrangled through the web a bit and found a bit more to explain things.

Latvia's dangerous gay-rights/no-rights brew
Since at least 2005 when a group of activists staged a gay pride march in Riga, gay rights has become a hot-button issue in Latvia. Although it was opposed by Latvia's prime minister, Aigars Kalvitis, activists staged a gay pride march in Riga in July 2005. Before the march, the Prime Minister said that Riga should "not promote things like that". "For sexual minorities to parade in the very heart of Riga, next to the Doma church, is unacceptable," he told the country's television station before the march. Despite the PM's misgivings, a few dozen people marched, according to the BBC.

 

[The] marchers were outnumbered by hundreds of protesters who blocked the narrow streets of the capital. Police were forced to alter the march route and to form a chain around the parade participants to protect them. The march had sparked outrage in Latvia and only went ahead after a court overturned a council ban on the event. Officials said that six of the protesters had been detained for their part in disrupting the march.
Although march organizers had initially been given a permit in 2005 by Riga's city council, the council withdrew the permits "after receiving letters and e-mails from religious and extremist groups threatening to disrupt it." A court order restored the permits just prior to the march.
No Pride counter-demonstrators in Riga,2006 Peaceful No Pride counter-demonstrators line a street in Riga photo: GayRussia.ru
In 2006 a public march permit for gay pride activists was again denied because of threats of violence -- a denial that was upheld by the courts. Activists in Riga settled for a church service and hotel rally, but the events were once again greeted with violent anti-gay protesters. This report on the 2006 events should be treated with some scepticism since it comes from a Russian source who is apparently quoting a London activist, Peter Tatchell, who tends to lace his statements with hyperbole. (Tatchell often comes across like a Larry Kramer with 'roid rage.) Tatchell offers this first-hand account in a web commentary printed by The Guardian:
After the banning of the march, the Latvian gay rights movement, Mozaika, switched to holding an indoor rally in the prestigious Reval hotel, in the heart of downtown Riga. By opting for an indoor, private rally, Mozaika had hoped to cool the inflammatory atmosphere. But the homophobes were not satisfied. The Reval was under siege all day on July 22 by about 250 protesters from the anti-gay No Pride movement - a menacing alliance of Christian fundamentalists, ultra-nationalists and neo-Nazis who represent a worrying revival of pro-fascist sympathies among sections of the Latvian population. White T-shirted No Pride thugs roamed the streets outside the hotel searching for gays and lesbians to attack. Anyone who looked the tiniest bit unstraight was liable to abuse and assault, even innocent passing tourists. For much of the afternoon and evening, the police seemed to stand back and let the No Priders terrorise people with virtual impunity.
This is the dangerous brew into which Hutcherson inserts himself with his now-dicredited claim to be a White House Envoy.
Hutcherson inserts himself into the controversy
Riga has a new mayor this year. He expressed guarded support for a gay rights march in the capitol in July.
In an interview with Diena newspaper, Janis Birks said he was ashamed at events last year, when bags of human excrement were thrown at gay marchers. The Mayor called for tolerance and understanding on all sides. Last month London Pride announced they would be "twinning" with Riga Pride as a sign of solidarity. "The problem is not in the march but sexual orientation," said Mr Birks. "We need to have discussion within society. What happened on the side of sexual minorities and the other side, I think we need understanding from both sides." Mr Birks said that if security could be provided, the march could go ahead. The Mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, welcomed his Latvian counterpart's comments, but urged Riga authorities to do more to protect gay people on the march. "Security is something that is under the control of the authorities," said Mr Livingstone. "It is their duty to ensure that demonstrators are able to exercise their right to peaceful protest. "I urge Mr Birks to complete the stand he has taken and ensure a peaceful Gay Pride demonstration takes place in an appropriate central venue in the city."
Hutcherson's friends -- the anti-gay activists who welcomed the so-called "White House Envoy" to Riga -- reacted angrily to the statement issued by London's mayor. In a letter to British Prime Minister Tony Blair, the anti-gay group "No Pride" called it "unacceptable that civil servants of the United Kingdom interfere with the Latvia's internal affairs." The anti-gay group called on Livingstone and LGBT people "to respect the views of Latvian society and their right to self-determination and sovereignty." No such call was made in November, 2006 when Hutcherson addressed a church gathering in Riga and criticized the country's president. This report on Hutcherson's sermon comes from an awkwardly translated report posted on the web page of New Generation, the Pentacostal church that hosted the Redmond preacher:
"My duty in this country is to defend righteousness!" Hutcherson said, "When I heard about the drawings in Diena newspaper and the publications insulting New Generation Church, I realized I must come to Latvia and engage myself in this battle for righteousness. "Scott and I wrote letters to the leaders of your government, state ministers and statesmen. I can read you the response from Vaira Vike-Freiberga." Kenneth Hutcherson [quoted] the Latvian President's letter which [stated] that [the] constitution of a democratic state provides for the freedom of speech and allows Diena to express its opinions whether Christians like it or not. She pointed out that the conflict was initiated mostly by the New Generation Church itself which is intolerant toward sexual diversity. ... "I came to you representing the White House," continued Hutcherson. "In my country, people will know how Latvia responded to antichristian statements. We need to stand for righteousness not only morally, but also physically and financially. It's a great battle for righteousness and no one can stop it. I promise to stand with you."
Apparently they think it's OK for someone who claims to be "representing the White House" to "interfere with the Latvia's internal affairs." Next post: History is politics in Latvia