November 2008

Source: Florida court decision [pdf], Orlando Sentinel, St. Petersburg Times, Chicago Tribune, Miami Herald, OpEd News
It's a contemporary Christmas tale that has all the tear-jerker elements required for the that literary genre.

Two boys -- one four years old, the other just four months old -- lived a dreadful life with their biological  parents, both crack addicts who mostly ignored the children.

The boys were freed from that hellish life during Christmas season, 2004, when a state child-services worker removed them from the home.

The older boy -- called "John Doe" in this telling of the tale -- wore only an dirty adult T-shirt when he was removed from the home. His feet were crammed into sneakers four sizes too small "that seemed more like flip-flops than shoes".

He suffered from a severe case of ringworm for which his parents had been given medication. But the medicine to treat John's scalp was unopened and expired when child-abuse investigator took him from the home along with his brother who is called "James Doe" in the tale.

James suffered from an untreated ear infection. Medicine for that condition was also found in the home, but it was nearly unused.

John didn't speak and "seemed depressed and presented a void, unresponsive demeanor and appearance."

According to the investigator, John's only concern was "changing, feeding, and caring for his baby brother." The four-year-old who did not speak was the infant's main caretaker, according to the investigator.

The investigator wanted to find them a caring home for Christmas. He turned to a foster parent with a Bachelor in Psychology and Masters Degree in Public Health who had taken in several challenging cases before. The investigator urged him to help temporarily in this difficult case.

"On that December evening, John and James left a world of chronic neglect, emotional impoverishment and deprivation to enter a new world, foreign to them, that was nurturing, safe, structured, and stimulating."

This true-life Christmas tale is told in an often riveting 53 page court decision written by Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Cindy Lederman, who ruled last week that the boys could be adopted by their foster father, 47-year-old Frank Martin Gill.

Four year after they first entered the home, in another Christmas season, the two boys enjoy a healthy childhood in the home of Gill, his partner "Tom Roe", and Roe's son Tom, Jr.

"John and James have lived in the same neighborhood, attended the same school, day care and aftercare since their arrival in the [Gill-Roe] home," Lederman writes. "As a result, each child has created friendships from school and in the neighborhood. John and James are closely bonded to Tom Roe, Jr., and their extended family. The boys consider [Gill's] and Roe’s parents, brothers and sisters their grandparents, uncles, and aunts. The extended family sends the boys gifts for their birthdays and the holidays. Roe’s mother, who lives in Tampa, visits the family regularly."

It's the kind of happy ending that should be the final act for such a Christmas tale, but -- as at least three op-ed columns printed Sunday recount -- it isn't the final chapter, even after Lederman's order approving adoption and what should be a permanent home for the boys.

It isn't the final chapter because Gill and Roe are gay, and in Florida, thanks to a 30-year-old law, gay people can't adopt children under any circumstance.

It isn't the final chapter because, as Mike Thomas recounts in an Orlando Sentinel commentary, the state is appealing Lederman's ruling.

More...

Source: Denver Post, Colorado Independent
Boulder, CO -- Congressman-elect Jared Polis (D-Boulder) and his partner, Marlon Reis, are expected to join 100 or so other protesters at the Century Boulder Theatre Sunday afternoon to protest a donation given the the theater company's CEO to the Prop. 8 campaign in California.

Alan Stock, CEO of Cinemark-Century Theaters which owns the Boulder moviehouse, donated $9,999 to the Yes on 8 Campaign, approved by California voters this month. The proposition prohibits same-sex marriage and has sparked other protests by equality activists.

The Century Boulder Theatre is being targeted because in December it will begin showing the film Milk, the story of San Francisco's Harvey Milk.

The film by Gus van Sant traces the life and death of California's first openly gay elected official (San Francisco Supervisor Harvey Milk) who was a leader of a successful 1978 campaign against an anti-gay initiative in California.

Protest organizers hope Sunday's protest will prompt film-goers to see the movie in a theater not owned by Cinemark.

In Colorado, Milk is also being shown at the Mayan Theater in Denver, an independent moviehouse, according to Colorado Independent.

"I think it's great people are voting with their wallets and hopefully going to see this movie elsewhere," Polis told the Denver Post. "Seeing it here (Century Boulder Theatre) contradicts everything Harvey Milk stood for."

Polis said he will ask Stock to make an equal contribution to a gay-rights cause.

"I think the company should make at least a good-faith effort and if they are willing to do that, I think they have an opportunity to regain the loyalty of the gay and lesbian community," Polis told the Post.

Focus Features, which is distributing Milk, intends to play the film in some Cinemark theaters, Los Angeles Times reports. But that has only encouraged online organizers to step up their efforts.

A website, called Anybody BUT Cinemark has been established to help movie-goers find theaters that aren't part of Cinemark's extensive network.

A Facebook group set up to encourage a general boycott of Cinemark theaters has attracted about 2,600 members. Another group on Facebook, No Milk for Cinemark has attracted almost 22,000 members who have pledged to watch the biography of Harvey Milk at a theater not owned by Cinemark.

It's ironic that a film honoring Milk will enrich the man who contributed to the downfall of equal rights for gays in California, said Johann Moonesinghe, a Boulder resident and organizer of Sunday's protest.

"We are not going to support a theater whose owner took away a large portion of our rights," Moonesinghe said, according to the Denver Post.

A similar protest at a Cinemark theater in Evanston, Ill. attracted about 400 protesters who carried signs and shouted chants on the sidewalk outside the theater.

Source: Boulder theater protest set by activists for gay rights | Denver Post 
Polis to join anti-Proposition 8 protest at Century Boulder Theater | Colorado Independent

Source: Concord Monitor, Foster's Daily Democrat
The lawmaker who sponsored New Hampshire's 2007 civil union bill says he believes that law was just one step in a process of gaining full equality for same-sex couples, and he plans to introduce legislation in January to allow gay and lesbian couples in the state to get marriage licenses.

Meanwhile, though opposition to civil unions has been muted since last year, legislators who opposed the civil union law last year are vowing pare it down in the next legislature, Concord Monitor reports.

Rep. Jim Splaine, an out gay Portsmouth Democrat who sponsored a bill last year that sets up civil unions, said he's filing a bill for same-sex marriage this year.

Splaine said he's not sure if marriage equality legislation will pass this year, but he believes it's important to continue the dialogue, Foster's Daily Democrat reports.

"While full marriage equality may not be attained in this coming year, I think we can make further progress by having that dialogue in a respectful manner," he said.

He said authorizing marriage is the only way for same-sex couples to attain full equality, according to Concord Monitor.

"From the beginning it's been a march toward full marriage equality and the dialogue needs to continue," Splaine said, according to Foster's Daily Democrat. "I'm introducing the full marriage equality legislation for 2009 because I believe the conversation about breaking down this area of discrimination has to continue."

The civil unions law became effective January 1, 2008. Civil unions give same-sex couples about 90 percent of the benefits and obligations that heterosexual couples get through marriage, Splaine said.

"We've got all of the same - and the words are in there - rights, obligations and responsibilities," said Splaine.

But, he said, the roughly 600 couples that have had civil unions in the state do not get all of the same benefits that married people do.

According to Splaine, the major problem with the civil union law is a gray area in the law that's up for interpretation, reports Foster's Daily Democrat.

For instance, individual businesses don't need to provide the same benefits and contracts for civil union couples that they do with married couples.

Meanwhile, Rep. David Hess (R-Hooksett)  has filed a request to repeal a portion of the law that recognizes same-sex marriages from other states as civil unions in New Hampshire. He called that aspect of the law

Hess said that he didn't move to repeal the civil union law because that would cause chaos in many people's lives, Concord Monitor reports.

"A lot of people have taken advantage of the civil union legislation. I think to repeal that would reap havoc in terms of the status of couples who have relied upon that," he said. "And also I don't find that nearly as contrary to public policy as the recognition of same sex marriages."

Splaine said he welcomes a dialog with Hess. "If David has a way to deliver all rights in a different way (than same-sex marriage), I welcome the opportunity to talk to him," he said.

Hess, a protestant Christian, argues it is not about equality, but about the sacred, spiritual nature of the institution of marriage, reports Foster's Daily Democrat.

Marriage "reflects all procreative elements and has strong religious overtones," Hess said. Same-sex marriage "flies in the face of tradition and religion. It's contrary to Judeo-Christian traditions and other worldly religions."

Splaine told reporters he does not believe gay marriage has anything to do with religion.

"There's nothing in the law saying the church has to commemorate the wedding," Splaine said, according to the Democrat. "They decide their own procedures, and there's nothing in this effort that impairs any religion or any church."

Splaine said he hopes by engaging in dialogue that others will recognize his viewpoint.

At least one other lawmaker will push to dramatically redefine civil unions so that they could apply to family members who live together, Concord Monitor reports. The current civil union statute is limited only to those over the age of 18 and forbidden for close relatives, including parents and children, siblings, and first cousins.

Rep. Robert Rowe is bringing back an argument mounted two years ago that those restrictions on family members are discriminatory and unnecessary. The restrictions on marrying close relatives, he said, is sensible because of the state's interest in protecting the gene pool, according to the Monitor.

"Obviously, two men or two women in a civil union cannot beget issue of their union," said Rowe, an Amherst Republican. "So there is really no point to having an exclusion."

Without the restriction, Rowe said, family members who live together and look after each other will be able to share insurance and other benefits.

Splaine says he's fine with the idea of giving family members the rights to enter into special contracts - but he wants those to be separate from civil unions.

"We would be devaluing even further gays and lesbians who have civil unions," he said. "At least now we have a specific way for same-gendered couples to be able to come together in civil unions."

Source: Representative hopes for same-sex marriage | Concord Democrat
N.H. gay marriage bill on the way | Foster's Daily Democrat

Source: Oklahoma Daily, GayPolitics.com, New York  Times

Oklahoma is conservative. Very conservative.

Voters in Oklahoma City -- the state's largest city and a place that had touted itself as "cosmopolitan" during its campaign to steal away a National Basketball Association team --  re-elected by a 58 percent majority notoriously anti-gay State Representative Sally Kern.

Kern made made national headlines when she said at a GOP luncheon that homosexuality "is destroying this nation," and that homosexuality is "the biggest threat our nation has, even more so than terrorism or Islam."

roth_attack_ad 
This ad appeared in the Oklahoma City daily shortly before the election, attacking an out gay candidate for a job that mostly has to do with oil and gay leases.

Incumbent Oklahoma Corporation Commissioner Jim Roth -- the only out gay politician in the state -- was defeated in a statewide race after last-minute attack ads and mailers suggested he would push a "homosexual agenda" in his role as a regulator of the state's energy industry, according to GayPolitics.com.

Every one of Oklahoma's 77 counties supported Sen. John McCain in the Nov. 4 election, making it the only state in the nation were every county voted Republican. Oklahoma voters backed McCain by almost two to one, bucking the tide that swept Obama to the presidency, according to the New York Times.

More...

Fired out gay radio host bounces back with standup act

Posted by NewsEditor  at 2:39 PM (PT)
In: celebrities, media

Source: San Francisco Chronicle, Huffington Post, Examiner

A week after San Francisco radio host Karel was fired by KGO radio, he announced he'd be back with a mike -- but not yet one that is attached to a radio transmitter.

Charles "Karel" Bouley announced last week that he will take the stage Dec. 3 at the Rrazz Room at the Hotel Nikko in San Francisco at 7 pm for a standup comedy act.

The openly-gay radio host was abruptly fired early this month after an election-season profanity-filled open-mike outburt by an openly gay San Francisco radio host became led to his quick dismissal from KGO radio.

An audio clip of Karel's profane response to a news item about an much-hyped election season character was widely spread by the conservative blogosphere.

Ben Fong-Torres explains the incident in a San Francisco Chronicle radio column. Karel was told by his engineer that his mike was turned off as a network newscast started.

When the newscast aired a sound bite from Sen. John McCain talking about Joe the Plumber, Karel began shouting obscenities and wishing the plumber dead. Listeners could clearly hear Karel (pronounced Ka-REL), along with the newscaster.

Karel's mike was finally cut off, and his producer told him his remarks had aired. When he returned, he apologized for his language, but the damage was done. He was placed on suspension three days later, and on Nov. 11, KGO management notified him that he was fired.

Karel kept his column at Huffington Post, and explained there a couple of days later,

I said words deemed profane by the FCC over commercial radio at a time when I have always been historically off the air, during a break. Not an excuse; a fact. The engineer left the mike hot and left the board, and thus the dump button to prevent my obscenity-laden, Tourette's-like outburst.

In a press releasing announcing his standup appearance, Karel touts what a Fox News Channel host has said to condemn him, and suggests his show onstage will be more free-spirited than the recent radio gig: 

As an openly gay talk radio sensation for years in #1 shows on #1 stations such as KFI Los Angeles and KGO San Francisco (which ended in the "F*/k Joe The Plu...." heard 'round the world), radio and television personality, author and HuffingtonPost.com columnist Karel takes his Hi-NRG personality and never secretive opinions from the airwaves and brings them to the stage, FCC be damned!

Source: KGO DJ Karel loses his job | San Francisco Chronicle
Explain? How Do You Explain Saying | Huffington Post
Fired Radio Host Karel Back in San Francisco--With a Standup Comedy Act | Examiner

Source: East Valley Tribune, Arizona Republic

mesa-temple-protest
mesa-temple-display
Mesa protest of Prop. 102 (above). Part of temples gaudy Christmas display (below) Photos: East Valley Tribune
This year's massive display of dazzling Christmas lights on the Mesa Arizona Mormon Temple grounds was challenged by the flickering candles of gay rights activists lining a street across from the temple which has for 29 years lit trees, walls, and statues on the temple grounds in a gaudy display of seasonal spirit.

The peaceful candlelight vigil attracted about 150 people protesting the church's support of Proposition 102, Arizona Republic reports.

"They're shining their light, we're shining ours," said Bobby Parker, an organizer and gay Mesa Mormon, East Valley Tribune reports.

Many members of the gay, lesbian and transgender community view Mormon votes and dollars as the deciding factor behind the passage of Proposition 102.

The proposition amends the Arizona Constitution to define marriage as being between one man and one woman and maintains the current statutory laws that ban gay marriage in Arizona.

Mormons contributed about $3 million of the $8 million raised in the "Yes on 102" campaign to amend the Arizona Constitution.

The biggest donors to the Yes 4 Marriage campaign in Arizona, before the primaries, were Nancy and David LeSueur and Kathleen and Wilford Andersen, two prominent Mormon families in Mesa, Arizona Republic reports.

Each family donated $100,000 cash, according to campaign-finance records.

Parker and his friend Clinton Bartlett pulled the Mesa vigil together on short notice.

Community members and organizers spread word of Friday night's vigil through Facebook, MySpace, phone calls, text messages, and word of mouth, according to the Tribune.

Parker, 64, came out to his Mormon family in January 2007.

"I lost my family, lost my church," he said.

Six days after passage of Proposition 102, more than 200 supporters of the gay community rallied at the corner of Camelback Road and Central Avenue in Phoenix. Bartlett also organized that campaign.

Yesterday, the protesters in Mesa held candles, rainbow flags, peace signs, and banners with the words love, acceptance, and harmony. They gathered at Pioneer Park on Main Street and Hobson.

Others raised concerns that political and religious suppression of gay rights contributed to the suicide of religious gay teens, and many were upset about church involvement in political affairs.

"It's time to get the church out of politics and out of our bedrooms," said Tom Kach. "Their God doesn't rule my world; my God loves and accepts everyone for who they are."

Some vehicles driving by honked in support of the demonstrators, but one person threw a dirty diaper out the window at them, Arizona Republic reports.

"I'm OK with it," said David Tueller, 43, of Mesa. "It's a free country."

His family of six comes out to the lighting every year and see protesters often, he said.

"They were peaceful. We just thought they were very nice."

The LDS church is surprised it is being singled out by protesters, said Don Evans, a local Mormon spokesman, according to reports from the Associated Press. This has become a standard comment from the church when protests are directed toward one of its facilities. The amendments in Arizona and California also were supported by the Catholic Church and various evangelical denominations, Evans told AP.

Source: Same-sex ban under protest during Mormon festivities | Arizona Republic
Gay community protests near temple display | East Valley Tribune

New York Senate may not vote on marriage equality this year

Posted by NewsEditor  at 1:02 PM (PT)
In: marriage equality, politics

Source: New York Times, New York Daily News, Gay City News
ALBANY -- Money from gay rights supporters poured in from across the country to several tight Senate races after a pledge from New York Democratic leaders that their party would legalize same-sex marriage if they won control of the State Senate this year. The money helped cinch a razor-thin Democratic victory.

Democrats won 32 seats in the election, but the Republicans, who appear to have won 30, have yet to concede defeat, New York Times reports.

But now, according to the Times, party leaders have sent strong signals that they may not take up the issue during the 2009 legislative session and might even delay it until after the 2010 election.

The vote in California for Proposition 8 surprised even some of the strongest supporters of the marriage equality bill, who now think it may be too early to press the issue in New York.

"I think the California proposition and the recognition that entities with large amounts of money who oppose same-sex marriage have decided to be large players in this have a lot of people going back to the drawing board," said Senator Liz Krueger, a Democrat who represents the Upper East Side.

Senator Thomas K. Duane, the Senate's leading advocate on gay and lesbian issues, told New York Times that the odds of a vote reaching the Senate floor in the 2009 legislative session are 50-50.

It's still not even clear that Democrats will gain final control over the upper chamber, because a "Gang of Three" dissident party members have refused to support the party's preferred majority leader, Senator Malcolm A. Smith of Queens.

The leadership dispute stems partly from disagreement about the marriage-equality bill and others supported by New York's LGBT lobbyists.

The Gang of Three even talked to Republicans last week about a "coalition" arrangement that would give the GOP a technical majority in the Senate, but would give plumb assignments to the dissident Democrats, New York Daily News reports.

In between negotiating the state budget and recruiting staff members, Smith is also busy trying to bring back into the fold dissidents who have threatened to back a Republican for majority leader.

At a meeting of LGBT activists last week, Duane said he wasn't "overly concerned" about the refusal of the "Gang of Three" to support Smith. Duane said Smith is "100 percent committed to same-sex civil marriage and 100 percent committed to bringing it to the floor."

But Duane and Alan Van Capelle, Empire State Pride Agenda's (ESPA) executive director, emphasized at the meeting that Republican votes for marriage equality will be needed if the bill is to pass in the Senate. Log Cabin's Jeff Cook said later, "We believe we will have Republican support, but we're not talking names yet," Gay City News reports.

The Pride Agenda keeps a running tally of the positions of senators on these and two other issues - transgender rights and a school anti-bullying bill - on its website at prideagenda.org, Gay City News reports.

Van Capelle said that while 55 percent of New Yorkers polled support opening marriage to gay couples, the more important figure to politicians is the finding that the issue was only important to 9-12 percent of voters making a decision in the booth. Many elected officials could be convinced that there is less downside to a pro-marriage vote than they might suspect.

But when a New York Times reporter tried to get comment from ESPA for its story on delay of consideration for the marriage equality bill, the organization that's known for aggressively pursuing news media attention, told the Times through a spokesman that it was in a "quiet period" and would not respond to questions.

The question of how aggressively to proceed on the marriage equality bill has touched off an intense debate among legislators and gay rights supporters about how ready the broader electorate is to embrace same-sex marriage, both in New York and across the country, New York Times reports.

Many activists and legislators are still stung by California voters' approval this month of a measure that reversed a court decision that gave gay and lesbian couples the right to marry. Heavy spending by church groups and others opposed to same-sex marriage helped the proposal win.

"We want to get there, but we want to get there the right way or else we risk setting ourselves back another decade," said Kreuger.

Source: N.Y. Democrats May Skip Gay Marriage Vote | New York Times 
Dean Skelos ups ante with Gang of 3 Woos Dems to keep Senate in GOP rule | New York Daily News
For State Senate, Delay to Get a Majority Leader | New York Times
Clashing, Meshing Over Marriage | Gay City News

Source: San Jose Mercury News, San Francisco Chronicle, Newsday
SAN FRANCISCO -- As a film about the life of Supervisor Harvey Milk plays on movie screens around the country, a concert and a twilight march today in San Francisco will commemorate the 30th anniversary of the deaths of Milk and Mayor George Moscone, who were assassinated by another supervisor 30 years ago this week.

The event starts with a 4 pm concert on the San Francisco City Hall steps, followed by a twilight march to Milk's camera store on Castro Street, event organizers said, according to Bay City News Service.

Speakers at the memorial will include family and friends of Milk and Moscone, and the musical portion will feature the San Francisco Gay Men's Chorus, members of the Lesbian/Gay Chorus of San Francisco, the San Francisco Lesbian/Gay Freedom Band, and the GLAM Youth Center.
More...

Source: Industry Standard, Bay Area Reporter
Mostly using web-based social networks, a new movement started this month after passage of Proposition 8 in California and similar anti-equality measure in Florida and Arizona.

Local protests were quickly organized throughout California and continued for more than a week after the Nov. 5 vote.

But it was the massive, coordinated series of protests throughout the country on November 15 that seems to have created a new mobilizing force for LGBT equality.

Although several local LGBT advocacy groups encouraged people on their mailing lists to join local protests, most of the rallies were organized without much input from the traditional groups.

The energy generated for and by those rallies could well simply dissipate, but it could also either prompt change in the established groups that have in the past pressed for LGBT legislation, or lead to new groups.

But longtime gay rights activist Cleve Jones, a friend of slain gay Supervisor Harvey Milk, discouraged the formation of new groups.

"The last thing we need right now are more big, cumbersome organizations with big budgets," Jones told the Bay Area Reporter. "We need people in the streets."

Using tools offered by a Seattle-based Internet startup, wetpaint.com, Amy Balliett of Seattle set up a website designed to help people organize local protests of the anti-gay votes.

She called the site JoinTheImpact.com.

In slightly more than a week, her webpage and associated groups on Facebook had managed to rally hundreds of thousands to turn out on November 15 for protests in cities large and small.

And it didn't go away after the November 15.

JoinTheImpact.com is now encouraging those inspired by the Nov. 15 rallies to join it in three actions.

  • Starting today, the website encourages a "LGBTQ Food Drive for Equality".
    "Beginning on November 28th, 2008 and going until we Light Up the Night for Equal Rights on December 20th, JoinTheImpact is launching the first national LGBTQ Food Drive for Equality! Through this event, we will work to reach out not only to those who have worked alongside us, but to organizations and individuals that fear us and oppose our cause."
  • on Dec 10, JoinTheImpact, encourages LGBT people to participate in a strike and boycott called "Day Without a Gay". "During the largest shopping season of the year, we ask that you do one very important thing: Don't Buy Anything! What would happen to this world if the LGBTQ community didn't exist?"
  • on Dec. 20, candlelight vigils will be scheduled under the title "Light Up the Night". The vigils will be held at commercial centers throughout the county "in remembrance of the rights that once were for 18,000 marriages, and in honor of the rights that one day will be again - for EVERYONE."

The Industry Standard, a technology business magazine, did a three-part online series by reporter Cyndy Aleo-Carreira on the use of web tools by Balliett and fellow organizers of the protests that followed the Prop. 8 vote.

A woman who attended a rally in San Diego along with a group of like-minded associates from the North County suburbs told Aleo-Carreira that she's convinced web tools made that rally possible.

"I don't think it could have been done without jointheimpact.com. [It gave us] one central location to find out what was going on and when it was happening in each city," Lindsey Padgett Brown told Aleo-Carreira. "Then, [you could] Email your friends and decide how to arrange it. Without the Internet, probably nothing of this magnitude could have happened so quickly."

A Connecticut resident, Robyn Greenspan, was visiting New Orleans on Nov. 15. She told the Industry Standard reporter that she first heard about the protests on Twitter and used Google maps to figure out that the New Orleans protest would be close to her hotel.

"It is mind-boggling to think that this was organized on a national level in about 10 days and this certainly wouldn't have happened had we relied on traditional media or 'old school' networks," Greenspan said. "Events like these--organized electronically and spread virally--and the success of Obama's social networking reach has heralded a new era and a demographic shift in how information is disseminated and used as an influence."

Despite the success of  online organizing for the rallies, Aleo-Carreira and others note there may be problems when organizing for the more mundane tasks associated with a political campaign.

Aleo-Carreira concludes:

There are several questions that remain. The first is whether this type of online-centric organization by the Join the Impact group could have changed the outcome of the ballot measures had it been launched before November 4. Second, it's hard to determine whether online tools are more effective than traditional methods of building support for a political issue. After all, supporters of Proposition 8 mobilized millions of voters using traditional methods, and won. These included television spots, print ads, and pamphlets. While these tactics are costly and take longer to build a groundswell of support, they also reach demographic groups who may not use Web tools to get information about political issues.

It's also not clear yet how the online organizing will interact with traditional gay rights lobbying and advocacy groups.

madabout8_banner It's clear that the traditional groups tried to benefit from the energy generated by the rallies. National Gay & Lesbian Task Force, which appeared to expend little effort to defeat Prop. 8 in California, nonetheless sent representatives to speak at several of the national rallies, according to news reports.

In Seattle, Washington's largest and richest LGBT lobbying and advocacy group, Equal Right Washington, hired Kyler Powell, who organized the successful local rally. He will become "Event Consultant" for the group's annual rally at the state capitol in Olympia, according to an email from the group.

The same group is asking donors to dedicate at least $8 a month using the banner "Mad about 8? Donate $8".

But many in California have questioned the pre-vote actions of the professional managers of California's largest advocacy groups. Equality California's Geoff Kors vacationed in Spain for more than two weeks in the summer. Co-leader of the No-on-8 campaign Lorri Jean of LA Center  spent a month in Alaska during the summer run up to the important election.

The vacations are part of a pattern of what some activists are now calling an inept campaign by those who have run the state's largest and best-funded LGBT groups.

Like others, Molly McKay, media director for Marriage Equality USA, has been critical of the No on 8 campaign's top-down approach to organizing, according to Bay Area Reporter.

She helped to organize what she thought would be a relatively small town hall to discuss the Prop. 8 campaign last week. But the event had to be postponed after the event drew more interest than organizers had anticipated, BAR reports.

McKay told the paper that she wants to help document specific experiences people have had around Prop 8 that will help show "the movable middle" the damage the measure's passage has caused.

McKay recalled for BAR's reporter the 9-year-old son of a lesbian couple who asked, "Does this mean they're going to come take me away from you?"

McKay is excited to see the generation of 20-somethings who've stepped up as leaders, and said coordination is important, however, "we want to be able to collaborate together, but not necessarily get into group-think mode."

"I think we want to create a structure so that it's more of a web than a skyscraper model," McKay told BAR.

Despite criticism of him and his group, Kors, who is executive director of Equality California and was a member of the No on 8 executive committee, told Bay Area Reporter, "It's great to see how many people are getting involved at such a major level."

"I think it's an opportunity to grow the number of people who are involved and add additional leadership to the fight," Kors said. "The more people working on this, the better. If we need to go back to the ballot, we're going to need everyone."

Political analyst David Latterman, president of Fall Line Analytics in San Francisco, told Bay Area Reporter that a lot of what's happening right now is "quite good," but some group will need to coordinate the fundraising, lobbying, and political outreach that needs to be done.

"At some point, somebody needs to be the boss," said Latterman. As with most social issues, there needs to be a "people's movement, but you need to manage that process," he said.

Asked if EQCA, one of the lead groups in the No on 8 campaign coalition, should be in charge, Latterman said, "If they learn their lessons, sure, why not? Who else could do it? What other groups are out there?"

Traditional LGBT groups like EQCA appear to be trying to capture at least some of the energy unleashed after the Prop. 8 and by the Nov. 15 rallies, but the best hope for the future may come from those who maintain a separation from the traditional groups.

Several of the new online activists appear to prefer to either form new groups, or to retain the informal nature of web-based social groups.

Tina Reynolds and her mostly LGBT staff at a small San Francisco company held a staff meeting after Prop 8 passed to figure out what they could do about it.

At a staff meeting, they came up with a mission statement, launched a Web site, and started developing T-shirts, stickers, and other materials to support the work of their brand new group, the Sacramento-based Equality Action Now.

Saturday, they helped put on a rally in Sacramento that drew an estimated 5,000 people.

Cleve Jones and Dustin Lance Black, the screenwriter for the Milk movie which opened in several cities this week, recently wrote a piece for the San Francisco Chronicle in which they called on equality supporters to "sustain and intensify the nationwide campaign of mass protests and nonviolent civil disobedience" for seven weeks, starting Thursday, November 27, the 30th anniversary of Milk's assassination, according to Bay Area Reporter.

Jones and Black then want people to gather en masse in Washington, D.C., on the morning of Tuesday, January 20, to honor the inauguration of President-elect Barack Obama.

"The strategy we've been following for the last 30 years to fight city by city, county by county, and state by state has failed," Jones said, leaving a patchwork of inequality where rights guaranteed in one place aren't necessarily guaranteed in others.

Jones thinks it's time for the kind of federal intervention performed when Congress and President Lyndon Johnson passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which made racial segregation in schools, public places, and employment illegal.

"I'm tired of waiting," said Jones, according to BAR. "It's been 30 years since Harvey was killed, and I'm not willing to wait another 30 years."

Source: Join the Impact and the Web, part III: Putting out the call | Industry Standard
Prop 8 opponents plot next moves | Bay Area Reporter

Researchers: Universal testing/treatment would slash AIDS in 10 years

Posted by NewsEditor  at 4:13 PM (PT)
In: health issues

Source: Washington Post, Scientific American, BBC
Universal HIV testing and immediate treatment for those who test positive could reduce AIDS by 95% within ten years, according to a new study.

The surprising conclusion is contained in a study published online Tuesday by British medical journal The Lancet. It postulates that AIDS could be wiped out even in areas were it's become a generalized epidemic using the testing/treatment strategy.

The study was sponsored by World Health Organization.

The findings are based on a mathematical model. They don't reflect a change in WHO's current recommendation of voluntary testing, the agency says. "This is a theoretical exercise based on mathematical modeling to stimulate discussion," Kevin de Cock, head of WHO's AIDS department, told the Washington Post.

The researchers used the computer model to examine the impact of testing all people aged 15 years and older for HIV every year and starting ART immediately after a person is found to be infected with HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, according to the Washington Post summary.

In an accompanying comment on the study, Professor Geoffrey P. Garnett of Imperial College London, U.K., wrote that this type of HIV control strategy "would reflect public health at its best and its worst."

"At its best, the strategy would prevent morbidity and mortality for the population, both through better treatment of the individual and reduced spread of HIV," Garnett wrote, according to the Post. "At its worst, the strategy would involve over-testing, over-treatment, side-effects, resistance, and potentially reduced autonomy of the individual in their choices of care."

Data from South Africa was used as a test case for a generalized epidemic, and the model assumed all HIV transmission was heterosexual, Washington Post reports in its summary.

"Instead of dealing with the constant pressure of newly infected people, mortality could decrease rapidly and the epidemic could begin to resemble a concentrated epidemic with particular populations remaining at risk. The focus of control would switch from making ART available to people with greatest need to providing support and services for those who are receiving ART. Transmission could be reduced to low levels, and the epidemic could go into a steady decrease towards elimination as those receiving ART grew older and died," wrote Dr. Reuben Granich, of the WHO's department of HIV/AIDS, and colleagues.

At the moment HIV testing and treatment are patchy, and while around three million people are receiving anti-retrovirals, a further 6.7 million need them, BBC reports.

But the WHO, while welcoming the study, warns that the feasibility of universal testing is challenged by weak health systems, according to BBC.

It adds that giving treatment to patients who are not yet sick may increase drug resistance, while the side effects of taking Aids treatment drugs for very long periods are as yet unknown but could be severe.

The calculations are based on how many HIV-positive South Africans were given ART between 2000 and 2005, and how many could have gotten them if South Africa's government had enacted an effective treatment program. Nearly 19 percent of the country's population, or 5.5 million people, is HIV-positive, according to the study.

 

Source: Universal Testing, Prompt Treatment Could Slash HIV | Washington Post
 Universal test 'would slash Aids' | BBC 
To end AIDS, test and treat everyone, study says | Scientific American