Thursday’s Referendum 71 signature checks in Washington continue to show an error rate on referendum petitions that is too high for the number of names submitted. The error rate has been increasing for checks done in the past two days.
From the blog maintained by Secretary of State Sam Reed’s office:
Referendum checkers, beefing up their efforts to determine whether R-71 gets a place on the statewide ballot, have processed another 3,831 signatures, bringing the total to over 27,000 checked so far. The latest daily count reflected an rejection rate approaching 15 percent.
The state Election Division crew rejected 573 signatures, mostly because the signers weren’t registered Washington voters, for a daily error rate of 14.96 percent. That was the highest daily error rate recorded in the first five days of signature-verification, and brought the cumulative error rate to 13.54 percent. That is somewhat above the 12.42 percent rate the sponsors will be able to absorb, once all signatures are counted.
It’s still too early to determine if the measure will make it onto the ballot, but the news for the past two days doesn’t look good for referendum backers.
If it makes it onto the November ballot, Referendum 71 would ask voters if they want to affirm or reject the expansion of rights and responsibilities for registered domestic partners that were passed in this year’s legislative session.
The grand totals so far:
27,288 checked, with 23,593 and 3,695 rejected — 3,226 for being a nonvoter, 90 duplicates, 295 for signature not matching and 84 pending county confirmation.
However, Sen. Ed Murray (D-Seattle), the lead senate sponsor of the domestic partnership bills, said yesterday “the current rate of invalid signatures clearly suggests that R-71 won't make the ballot”. In his statement, reported yesterday by Seattle PI’s Strange Bedfellows blog, Murray disputes the math used on the Secretary of State’s blog to calculate the error rates. The PI prints his explanation of the math dispute.
(But, beyond it all, Reed and his spokesman David Ammons deserve kudos for the blog and for the office’s transparency on the whole issue.)
Source: From Our Corner