EW.com touts a very brief piece now on the site as an “Exclusive Q&A with Adam Lambert”. To be fair, this brief item is to be followed by a series of additional “Exclusive! Q&A” postings dealing with other subjects.
For this first installment of the “Exclusive!” series, Whitney Pastorek—the not-quite questioner for this Q&A—tackles the obvious questions which concern what she calls the “OUT magazine kerfuffle”.
She refers, of course, to the editor’s letter that Out editor Aaron Hicklin penned for this week’s big “Out 100” issue.
Lambert, obviously, is one of the 100, but Hicklin complains in his letter that Lambert’s management, in talks with the magazine, was reluctant to offer to Out the kind of full cover-story access that they gave to Details magazine, for example.
Lambert is about to release his eagerly anticipated first album, For Your Entertainment. After several weeks as a best-seller on Amazon when it was still more a month from actual release, the album will finally be available for purchase Monday.
Because of that, Lambert appears to be something of a celebrity it-boy this week. He is on a promotional tour during which he, like anyone else on such a tour, will talk to almost—but not quite—anyone with a microphone or a laptop.
In that context, EW.com—whose chosen job it is to do such things—can’t be faulted for overhyping its smarmy, shallow puff-piece on Lambert.
EW’s writer asked only the most obvious questions, and didn’t probe at all or ask any of those pesky “follow-up” type questions. Perhaps there was something arranged before hand between interviewer and publicist?
That means that this “Exclusive Q&A” has far too few Q’s, so we’ve added (exclusively!!) a few fake Q&As below along with the real repartee which is indented.
[Q, below, is the fake Pastorek for whom I’ve done my best to maintain some of the spirit of her it’s-just-us-against-the-silly-gays smarminess. A. is the fake Lambert. Unfortunately, I can’t really guess what the real Lambert might have said if he’d been asked something like these question. But he appears to be articulate and thoughtful in this brief interview, so I’m sure they would have been an interesting read.]
More...